So, whatever you treated a single (self-reported) choices –relationship apps use– integrated, indeed, essential differences in motivations otherwise intensity

So, whatever you treated a single (self-reported) choices –relationship apps use– integrated, indeed, essential differences in motivations otherwise intensity

Response: That it possible analysis could well be fascinating, for sure, however for the search question. If for example the reviewer considers that our analyses commonly appropriate answer our very own search question (to not ever other possibly interesting search inquiries), we wish to come across a definite malfunction ones advised analyses and you will a justification in their mind. While the the newest reviewer has not yet rationalized this time and contains only described exactly what the guy/she would want to see or could have done-by himself/herself, we have found you don’t need to do this. The goals of our own manuscript are unmistakeable; maybe not specifically challenging, but obvious: examine users and you can nonusers when you look at the mating orientations. The fresh new recommended analysis is not necessarily the you to definitely necessary to just be sure to provide an answer to the research question.

Out-of a statistical perspective, this has been noted for an eternity one to dichotomizing details is not a good behavior (Cohen, 1983).

The SOI-Roentgen performed declaration differences between folks (expected). Yet , on displayed regression (dining table dos) the results are unanticipated to the Penke & Asendorpf (2008, p. 14). Why does? How does so it look-in the complete model?

Response: Once again, we have got issues to fully understand the opinion. Therefore, we really do not do any alter out of this matter.

e.grams. 222-229: Brand new talk as well as the principle are writing about the brand new objectives regarding users. Yet , no aim are examined, but attitudes. The web link anywhere between both was lost throughout the post, please offer certain further literary works otherwise concentrate on attitudes.

Response: We be sorry for not to ever getting decided on this point. With all this doing situation, i get acquainted with if you will find differences in mating orientations (short-name, long-term) based on though you are a user out of relationship applications. Our very own means is based on previous search did about this procedure and, till the better of all of our degree, there’s absolutely no choice method out of this issue that has exhibited are a lot better than the present that. Therefore, we do not would changes in the newest manuscript according with so you’re able to so it review.

Severe: The new site of solitary students are lost prior to (identity or perhaps in the 1st half the newest abstract).

From the beginning of one’s manuscript, i talk about the things about the usage dating apps and you to, in spite of the current stereotype, you can use them to own numerous types of reasons, besides for the seek relaxed sex

Response: Thank you so much very much for this opinion. After the the testimonial, i have included this dilemma in the first 50 % of the new abstract (p. 2, range 28): “Members was basically 902 single children away from a mid-proportions Language university…”. Other than that, on Members and you can Procedure section, we mentioned: “This study is element of a much bigger endeavor done in a beneficial Foreign-language college that aimed to understand more about multiple regions of the newest sex out of young people” (today, inside p. 6, lines 142-143). Furthermore, i said “the author?s college or university” (p. 7, line 170), and therefore issue is mentioned within the study’s constraints (today, inside the p. fifteen, outlines 336-340).

235: “Conclusions”. Because the correlations is showed and you will hypothesis examined in a combination-sectional data, the fresh wording would-be chose a great deal more innovative.

Response: We have very carefully looked this part and we also have not been capable of getting any causal allege. I’ve tried to explain our performance as ‘differences’, ‘correlations’ or ‘associations’. In case i skipped people causal allege, we will switch it.

The usage of relationship software is examined instead of delving to the particular uses, away from those who used it on a single day while the a laugh among friends to those which used it to have months lookin having a connection

Response: Many thanks for their testimonial. There is incorporated more information on the Constraints section, to provide the points said of the writers (today within the pp. 15-sixteen, traces 341-365):

The study has actually plenty of limitations. Almost every other restrictions was in fact pertaining to the brand new representativeness of your test and you can the new generalization of one’s efficiency. One of several finally members, the fresh new attempt try mostly lady, aged between 18 and you can twenty six, single and you will from one college or university, putting some performance hard to generalize to university students and you may, however smaller so you’re able to young non-university students.

Bir cevap yazın

E-posta hesabınız yayımlanmayacak. Gerekli alanlar * ile işaretlenmişlerdir